Legal Opinion

Mercantile Collection Bureau v. Roach

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 1, 1961No. Civ. 10112PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARNS, J. pro tem. *

The respondent Mercantile Collection Bureau levied under a writ of execution issued December 24, 1959, on the real property involved in this appeal, title to the property standing in appellant’s name. Appellant then filed his “Petition for Determination of Rights,” which is in the nature of an action to quiet title. The trial court entered judgment in favor of respondent Mercantile Collection Bureau. Petitioner, Domenico Ruggiero, appeals from the judgment.

The trial court’s findings of fact are substantially as follows : “That the respondent, who is the plaintiff above…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Campbell v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Laubisch v. RoberdoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Spear v. FarwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Curnow v. GravelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Sels v. BunnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Weeks v. Pederson (In Re Pederson)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. Wells Fargo Bank, Minnesota, N.A. v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Majewsky v. Empire Constr. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Warren v. RodgersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Wilkinson v. WilkinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API