Legal Opinion

In Re George R. Evanega and Winfried Albert

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided September 21, 1987No. 86-1667PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHER, Circuit Judge.

George R. Evanega and Winfried Albert (Evanega) appeal the affirmance by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (board) of a patent examiner’s rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 (1982 & Supp. 1985) of all eight claims of their application for a patent on a Method for Enzyme Immuno-Determinations in Heterogenous Phase. 1 We reverse.

BACKGROUND

The claimed invention is an improvement in competitive immunoassays used to determine the amount of a specific binding protein in a sample. Such assays are used, for example, to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Panduit Corporation v. Dennison Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  3. International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. Quality Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. In re SichertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  5. In Re Jay P. NielsonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Dennis T. GrendahlCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  2. Trans Continental Records, Inc., Trademark Trial and Appeal Board2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API