Legal Opinion

Lanyon Zinc Co. v. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 17, 1902No. 1,586PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kansas.

1Opinion of the Court

THAYER, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order granting an injunction pendente lite in a patent case. The infringing device, the use of which was restrained, is an ore-roasting furnace, manufactured in full accordance with letters patent No. 523,013, issued to Alfred Ropp in January, 1895. This patent was considered by this court in the case of Extraction Co. v. Brown, 43 C. C. A. 568, 104 Fed. 345, and it was held that an ore-roasting furnace constructed in accordance with the specifications of that patent, with a supplemental chamber designed to protect the rabble operating mechanism…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Metallic Extraction Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  2. Metallic Extraction Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  3. De Laval Separator Co. v. Vermont Farm-Mach. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Vermont · 1901

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brown v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
  2. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co. v. Metropolitan S. S. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1908
  3. Murray Co. v. Continental Gin Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1907
  4. Lanyon Zinc Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  5. Lanyon Zinc Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API