Legal Opinion
Metallic Extraction Co. v. Brown
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 18, 1901No. 1,346PublishedCited by 11 opinions
On Rehearing.
1Opinion of the Court
THAYER, Circuit Judge.
In our former decision in this case (43 C, C. A. 568, 104 Fed. 345) we announced no conclusion respecting the validity of claim 4 of the patent No. 471,264, granted to Horace F. Brown for improvements in ore-roasting furnaces, because on the first argument of the case little, if anything, was said by counsel for either party respecting that claim; for which reason it was assumed that in the estimation of counsel the device covered thereby was unimportant, and that the first claim of the patent, the merits, of which were discussed at length, embraced everything of value…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McCarty v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Frederick R. Stearns & Co. v. RussellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
- Metallic Extraction Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- Wilson v. McCormick Harvesting Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1899
- Albany Steam Trap Co. v. FelthousenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. StickneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Brown v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
- Liquid Carbonic Co. v. Gilchrist Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1918
- Rollman Mfg. Co. v. Universal Hardware WorksDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1913
- Lanyon Zinc Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.