Legal Opinion

De Laval Separator Co. v. Vermont Farm-Mach. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Vermont

Decided June 10, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Equity. Suit for infringement of a patent. On motion by defendant to dismiss.

1Opinion of the Court

WHEELER, District Judge.

This suit is brought for alleged infringement of a patent. It is at issue, and the plaintiff has closed its opening proofs, including an assignment of the patent, proved only by acknowledgment, according to; the act of 1897, taken abroad before the act was passed. The defendant moves to have the bill dismissed for this want of proof of title to the patent, and so of any right to relief. The plaintiff insists that this procedure is irregular, and that the proof is sufficient. This motion is not like *814that in Snow v. Sargent (C. C.) 106 Fed. 230, where it was made on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Snow v. SargentU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1901

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lanyon Zinc Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  2. Murray Co. v. Continental Gin Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1907
  3. Hardinge Conical Mill Co. v. Abbe Engineering Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API