Legal Opinion

Wolfe v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 12, 1911PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The three exceptions to evidence are without merit and need not be discussed, nor do we deem it necessary to discuss seriatim the numerous exceptions to the charge.

The plaintiff was defendant's watchman at a crossing in Monroe, over which there were nine railroad tracks. This crossing is within the corporate limits and is used by a very large number of people, in consequence of which defendant employed plaintiff as a watchman to keep a lookout and conduct persons and vehicles safely across.

On 25 August, 1906, the plaintiff was on duty at the crossing and saw a wagon and a man walking beside…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nichols v. WalterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  2. Henze v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  3. Cooper v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Johnson v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. Coleman v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Johnson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. Johnson v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. Shepard v. Norfolk & Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Fann v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. Perry v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API