Legal Opinion
Tracy v. Norvell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 31, 1923No. 13043PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RAY, C.
This is an action to foreclose a real estate mortgage. No defense was offered, but the defendants, by (their answer, pleaded a counterclaim upon which issue was joined and trial had, which resulted in favor of the defendants upon their counterclaim and, by the judgment, deducted from the demand of the plaintiff. Plaintiff appeals.
The undisputed facts are: December 23, 1918, in eonsidteration of services performed, the plaintiff deeded to the defendant Woodson E. Norvell, by warranty deed, 36 lots. in what is now known as Norvell Park addition to the city of Tulsa and, in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Johnson v. Acme Harvesting MacH. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Southard v. Arkansas Valley & W. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- First Nat. Bank of Lawton v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Harris v. Warren-Smith Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Tracy v. NorvellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Ada v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Gooldy v. J. B. Klein Iron & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Abraham v. State Ex Rel. MotherseadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Board of Education of Town of Ringling v. State Ex Rel. BentonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- BLUFF CREEK TOWNHOMES ASSOC., INC. v. HAMMONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.