Legal Opinion

In Re Guardianship of Hudson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 19, 1945No. 34,038PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 20 N.W.2d 330. On September 22, 1943, the probate court of Goodhue county appointed respondent special guardian of appellant's estate on the ground that appellant was incompetent to manage her own affairs. On October 26, 1943, she filed a petition for restoration to capacity. After due hearing the probate court granted the petition and filed an order restoring her to capacity and requiring the special guardian to file a final account. The special guardian appealed to the district court and obtained a reversal of the probate court's order. Appellant moved for amended findings or…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Barrett v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. In Re Restoration to Capacity of MastersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Singer v. Allied Factors, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. In Re Guardianship of StromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  5. Seeling, Jr. v. Deposit Bank Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Muggenburg Ex Rel. Muggenburg v. LeightonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. In Re Guardianship of HudsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. Wilson v. MolineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  4. In Re Guardianship of HudsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  5. Wolff v. LerumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API