Legal Opinion

In Re Guardianship of Hudson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 16, 1948No. 34,650PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 33 N.W.2d 848. Appeal from an order denying appellant's motion for a new trial.

The proceeding is one by appellant as special guardian to have allowed a supplemental final account covering $731.50 in expenses incurred by him prior to the appointment and qualification of respondent as general guardian, and further to have allowed another supplemental final account for $546.90 for expenses incurred by him subsequent to the appointment and qualification of respondent as such general guardian.

Appellant, W.T. Corwin, was appointed special guardian of the estate of Nettie Hudson on…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Sache v. WallaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  2. Laing v. RigneySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Davis v. HudsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  4. Jasperson Ex Rel. Drew v. JacobsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  5. Saylor v. DuelIllinois Supreme Court · 1908

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Leslie v. Minneapolis Society of Fine ArtsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Hanson v. WoolstonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  3. Peterson v. WillyardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  4. In Re Guardianship of HudsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  5. State v. NodesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API