Legal Opinion

People v. Gordon

California Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1928No. Docket No. Crim. 3128PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment of conviction for the crime of embezzlement. Persuasive testimony offered by the prosecution in support of the charges filed against him showed the facts to be substantially as follows:

In December, 1919, one James E. Fisher bought from Robert Marsh & Company of Los Angeles four $1,000 bonds. In October, 1921, he made an unsuccessful attempt to collect the amount due upon them. Immediately thereafter, answering an advertisement, he called at the office of a collection agency in San Diego, where he met one Hinckley, by whom he was introduced to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. People v. HickmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. People v. ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. People v. BannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  5. People v. MainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. TalbotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. People v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. People v. BuggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. People v. LimaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. People v. KnightonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API