Legal Opinion

People v. Taylor

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 30, 1986No. Crim. 13256PublishedCited by 16 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CARR, J.

A jury convicted defendant of the rape of a mentally incompetent person. (Pen. Code, § 261, subd. (I).) He appeals, contending: (1) insufficiency of the evidence; (2) error in the denial of his motion for a psychiatric examination of the victim; (3) hearsay evidence was erroneously admitted; (4) error in admitting evidence of an uncharged act; and (5) his motion to introduce evidence of his reputation for truth and veracity was erroneously denied. We conclude the last contention has merit, and in this close case where credibility was the key issue, that the error requires…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
  3. People v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. People v. HaskettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. People v. AlvarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. People v. SoojianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. State Board of Education v. HonigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API