Smith v. Pueblo Mercantile & Credit Ass'n
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison
Smith had a verdict and judgment against him in an ■action brought by him against the company and Thomas, sheriff, defendants in error, for treble damages for attachment of exempt property, and brings error.
The company brought an attachment suit against Smith and levied on the property in question, an automobile, and the judgment in that action was for defendant, Smith, and the issue of exemption was decided for him. Smith claimed his exemption and demanded the machine two days after the levy but the sheriff, having been indemnified by the Pueblo Company, refused to surrender it and did not…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Lovejoy v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Sandberg v. BorstadtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
- City of Colorado Springs v. StreetSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
- Harrington v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Roup v. Commercial Research, LLCSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
- Penrose v. StevensSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
- In Re Van WinkleUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2001
- Larson v. Sharp (In re Sharp)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Beneficial Finance Co. of Colorado v. SchmuhlSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.