Legal Opinion · Dissent

Beneficial Finance Co. of Colorado v. Schmuhl

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 10, 1986No. 84SC206Published

1DissentDubofsky, Justice

Because I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that a security agreement on a mobile home creates an implied waiver of statutory exemption as to the mobile home and because the exemptions from levy and attachment are to be liberally construed with exceptions only as specified by statute, I respectfully dissent. I would remand this case to allow the district court to determine whether, as Beneficial Finance Company (Beneficial Finance) asserts, the Schmuhls failed to claim their exemption within the time period allowed by statute and whether Beneficial Finance has waived its right to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mayhugh v. CoonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Sandberg v. BorstadtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  3. Sherwin-Williams Co. v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1941
  4. First National Bank of Denver v. District Court Ex Rel. the City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  5. Industrial Loan & Investment Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API