Legal Opinion

Penrose v. Stevens

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 15, 1937No. 13,912PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holland

Stevens, defendant in error, was plaintiff in the district court where he obtained a judgment, based on a statutory penalty, against plaintiffs in error. To reverse the judgment, the writ of error herein is prosecuted. Reference will be made to the parties as they were aligned in the trial court, namely, as plaintiff or Stevens, and defendants.

Stevens was the owner of a 1931 model Ford truck in March, 1932, at which time the Salida Creditmen’s Association, one of the defendants, obtained a judgment against him in the justice court. About two years later this association caused execution to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Federal Agency Investment Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  2. Hamner & Co. v. JohnsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Smith v. Pueblo Mercantile & Credit Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Seacord v. Commerce Bank of Blue Hills (In Re Seacord)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1980
  2. Lingle State Bank of Lingle v. PodolakWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  3. In re KelseyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2012
  4. In Re SpykstraUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1988
  5. In Re BlackUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API