Legal Opinion

Cupples v. Watson, Commissioner of Patents

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 26, 1953No. 11401_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant seeks to require appellee, the Commissioner of Patents, to admit him to practice before the Patent Office despite his failure to pass an examination. The trial judge thought it his duty, among other things, to read the examination questions and appellant’s answers to them and to review the grading of these answers to the extent of determining that “by reasonable tests, the officials of the Patent Office acted fairly and without discrimination in the grading of the plaintiff’s examination, pursuant to a uniform standard, that the plaintiff failed to pass the required examination,”…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cupples v. MarzallDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1952

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Richard M. Franchi v. Harry F. Manbeck, Jr., Assistant Secretary of Commerce & Commissioner of Patents & TrademarksCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  2. Application of PetersonAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Klein v. PetersonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1988
  4. Leeds v. MosbacherDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1990
  5. Slater v. QuiggDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API