Legal Opinion

Slater v. Quigg

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 24, 1986No. 85-2736PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

REVERCOMB, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 32, 37 C.F.R. § 10.157 (1985) and Rule 1-26 of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Rule 1-26 provides that a “person refused recognition to practice or suspended or excluded from practice before the Patent Office may file a petition in this Court against the Commissioner of Patents for review of such action ...”

Petitioner is an attorney admitted to practice in the Courts of the State of New York and the State of Illinois. Petitioner maintains his office in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kingsland v. DorseySupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Cupples v. MarzallDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1952
  3. Cupples v. Watson, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Leeds v. MosbacherDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API