Cupples v. Marzall
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
KEECH, District Judge.
This action is brought by the plaintiff, Plomer L. Cupples, against the Commissioner of Patents in dual aspect: (1) for mandamus to compel the Commissioner to admit the plaintiff to practice before the United States Patent Office, and (2) for review tinder 35 U.S.C.A. § 11, as supplemented by Local Civil Rule 95, of the Commissioner’s action denying the plaintiff admission to practice.
In view of the statutory provision for judicial review of the Commissioner’s denial of admission to practice, the court holds that mandamus will not lie.
The second aspect of plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kingsland v. DorseySupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Hatch v. OomsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1947
3Cited by8 opinions
- Richard M. Franchi v. Harry F. Manbeck, Jr., Assistant Secretary of Commerce & Commissioner of Patents & TrademarksCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Application of PetersonAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- Cupples v. Watson, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
- Gager v. LaddDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1963
- Klein v. PetersonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.