Legal Opinion
Klein v. Peterson
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 16, 1988No. Civ. A. 87-2661, 87-2950PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HAROLD H. GREENE, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 32 and Local Rule 213, which provides that a person “suspended or excluded from practice before the Patent Office may file a petition in this court against the Commissioner of Patents for review of such action.... ”
On August 20, 1984, a disciplinary proceeding, Nakamura v. Klein, was instituted in the Patent and Trade Office (PTO) against plaintiff pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 32 and 37 CFR 1.348 (1984). Plaintiff was charged with four counts of misconduct arising out of the handling of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pottsville Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Fmc Corporation v. The Manitowoc Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- William J. Carter v. United States Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Klein v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- HOUSING AUTHORITY OF COUNTY OF KING v. PierceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1989
- Klein v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Worley v. United States Patent & Trademark OfficeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000