Legal Opinion

Bigelow v. Calumet & Hecla Mining Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan

Decided October 3, 1908PublishedCited by 9 opinions

For opinion of Circuit Court of Appeals affirming decree, see 167 Fed. 721.

1Opinion of the Court

KNAPPEN, District Judge.

In the opinion filed by this court upon the application for a preliminary injunction in the case first above entitled .(Bigelow v. Calumet & Hecla Mining Company [C. C.] Í55 Fed. 869), the claims of the complainant presented in that cause, as well as the conclusions reached upon the various legal questions there raised, are fully stated. The bill of complaint in the second cause contains, so far as material to this opinion, substantially the same allegations of fact and legal deductions therefrom as the. bill in the first cause, except in certain respects to which…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Northern Securities Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cia. Petrolera Caribe, Inc. v. Arco Caribbean, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  2. William Goldman Theatres, Inc. v. Loew's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
  3. Hyams v. Calumet & Hecla Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  4. State v. Lewis & Leidersdorf Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  5. United States v. New York Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API