Legal Opinion
William Goldman Theatres, Inc. v. Loew's, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 2, 1945No. 8639PublishedCited by 99 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEAHY, District Judge.
The question we meet is whether plaintiff has supported its charge of illegal monopoly that defendants have violated § 2 of the Sherman Act, 26 Stat. 209, 15 U.S.C.A. § 2, 1 in order to support an action for injunctive relief and triple damages under § 4 of the Clayton Act 2 38 Stat. 731, 15 U.S.C.A. § 15. Plaintiff relied too on § I of the Sherman Act, 3 50 Stat. 693, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1; and while this section states an additional offense “the two sections overlap in the sense that a monopoly under § 2 is a species of restraint of trade under § 1.” 4 There are eleven…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Board of Trade of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Lorain Journal Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Edward J. Sweeney & Sons, Inc., and Mission Gas Oil Company, Inc. And Petroleum Products Co. v. Texaco, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Williamsburg Wax Museum, Inc. v. Historic Figures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Hecht v. Pro-Football, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.