United States v. New York Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
District Court, E.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, District Judge.
The information in this cause charges, in the first count, that defendants unlawfully formed and carried out, in part within the Eastern District of Illinois, a combination . and conspiracy unreasonably to restrain interstate commerce in food products; and, in count two, that they entered into and carried out, in the same manner, a con-spiracy to monopolize a substantial part of such products in interstate commerce, all in violation of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S. •C.A. §§ 1-7, 15 note.
The corporate defendants are: The New 'York Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.,…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Sunbeam Corp. v. Payless Drug StoresDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1953
- Union Pacific Railroad v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1964
- United States v. New York Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
- Noerr Motor Freight, Inc. v. Eastern Railroad Presidents ConferenceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
- Stevens v. American Service Mutual Insurance Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.