State Ex Rel. Londerholm v. American Oil Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Harman, C.:
Appellants seek reversal of a district court order refusing to suppress certain inquisition testimony allegedly taken unlawfully and in violation of appellants’ federal and state constitutional rights.
On behalf of the state of Kansas and the state highway commission the attorney general in February, 1966, commenced this action against thirteen corporate suppliers of liquid asphalt, alleging the corporations had allocated territory and rigged prices on their asphalt sales to the highway commission in violation of the Kansas antitrust laws (K.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Grosjean v. American Press Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- In Re GrobanSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Rad-O-Lite of Philadelphia, Inc. A/K/A Pre-Emption Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Kiddie v. KiddieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- State Ex Rel. Stephan v. LaneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Sanborn v. Koscot Interplanetary, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- Atchison, T. & SF Rly. Co. v. COMM. ON CIVIL RIGHTSSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.