Legal Opinion
United States v. Rad-O-Lite of Philadelphia, Inc. A/K/A Pre-Emption Devices, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 28, 1979No. 79-1551PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SEITZ, Chief Judge.
Rad-O-Lite of Philadelphia, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation, appeals from its conviction for conspiracy to engage in racketeering activities. 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d) (1976). Rad-O-Lite asks us to find that its sixth amendment right to assistance of counsel was violated at trial because of the joint representation of the corporation and the corporate officer responsible for the actions that led to the conspiracy charges against Rad-O-Lite. The appellant also asserts error in the district court’s denial of its motion to strike references to “Pre-Emption…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- First Nat. Bank of Boston v. BellottiSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- United States v. Michael G. Thevis, Alton Bart Hood, Global Industries, Inc., Anna Jeanette EvansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Shukri BakerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Zepp, Jo-Ann. Appeal of Jo Ann ZeppCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Billy G. ByersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Percy TravillionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.