North v. Ringling
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPecora, J.
This is a derivative action brought by owners of 37% of the stock of a corporation against officers and directors thereof. The complaint alleges two causes of action. The first cause, after alleging ownership of stock and the relationship of the parties to the corporation, follows with allegations that the corporation operates a circus and gives exhibitions in many large cities which are attended by thousands of spectators. The complaint then describes the physical conditions attending circus performances and alleges that the assemblage- of many thousands of persons during performances…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Helme v. . BuckelewNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Kirkbride v. Van NoteNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Miller v. . QuincyNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Cohn v. Mishkoff Costello Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Johnson v. . WallisNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Taormina v. Taormina Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1951
- Taormina v. Taormina Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1951
- Kruskal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Lincoln First Bank, N. A. v. SanfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Ackert v. AusmanNew York Supreme Court · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.