Cohn v. Mishkoff Costello Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The action is brought by a stockholder against the defendant, a foreign corporation organized under the laws of the State of Indiana, demanding judgment that defendant either redeem shares of its stock at par value with accumulated interest or in the alternative declare a dividend out of its surplus.
The courts of this State will not take jurisdiction, in ordinary cases, to regulate the internal affairs of a corporation which ought to be managed under the laws and by the direction of the courts of the State or country where it is organized. (Travis v. Knox Terpezone Co., 215 N. Y. 259, 264.)…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Travis v. . Knox Terpezone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Topken, Loring & Schwartz, Inc. v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
3Cited by36 opinions
- Rogers v. Guaranty Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Williams v. Green Bay & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Broida v. BancroftAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Weiss v. RouthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Langfelder v. Universal Laboratories, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.