Legal Opinion
Ackert v. Ausman
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 23, 1961PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBirdie Amsterdam, J.
The defendant, Investors Diversified Services, Inc. (hereinafter called “IDS”), moves to dismiss this action on the ground of forum non convemens or, in the alternative, to stay the action pending the determination of a companion suit pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, or, in the alternative, to compel the plaintiff to add Investors Mutual, Inc., as an indispensable party and to stay all further proceedings herein until that party is added.
This is a stockholder’s derivative action allegedly brought on behalf of the defendant Investors Mutual,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Penn Central Casualty Co. v. Pennsylvania Ex Rel. SchnaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Williams v. Green Bay & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- General Investment Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Langfelder v. Universal Laboratories, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Thomson v. Continental InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- In Re Optimal U.S. LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Ackert v. AusmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Ackert v. AusmanNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- Gallo v. MayerNew York Supreme Court · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.