Legal Opinion

Yarber v. Oakland Unified School District

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 31, 1992No. A052740PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROUSE, J. *

In this case we hold that plaintiff engaged in a “hazardous recreational activity” when he injured himself playing basketball in a junior high school gymnasium, and defendant school district is immune from liability under Government Code section 831.7. We find it unnecessary to discuss the issue of assumption of risk raised by defendant. The judgment for plaintiff is reversed, and the trial court is directed to enter judgment for defendant school district.

I

The facts are undisputed. Anthony Yarber was injured while playing in an adult basketball game, after school hours, at…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Knight v. JewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Peterson v. San Francisco Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Ford v. GouinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Danieley v. Goldmine Ski Associates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Gibbons & Reed Co. v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Iverson v. Muroc Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Avila v. Citrus Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Home v. North Kitsap School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  4. Acosta v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Ochoa v. California State UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API