Legal Opinion
Hoffman v. Arave
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided June 13, 1997No. Civil 94-0200-S-BLWPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER REGARDING PROCEDURAL DEFAULT AND MOTION FOR EVI-DENTIARY HEARING
WINMILL, District Judge.
Pursuant to the court’s scheduling order, the parties to this habeas action have submitted briefs addressing the application of the procedural default bar to the grounds for relief set forth in the final petition for writ of habeas corpus. The parties also have filed briefs addressing the petitioner’s motion for a federal evidentiary hearing. Having examined the available law, the record and the materials submitted by the parties, the court now rules as follows.
DISCUSSION
A.…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Maxwell Hoffman v. A.J. Arave, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. New York City Human Resources AdministrationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Maxwell Hoffman v. Arvon J. Arave, Warden, Idaho Maximum Security Institution, Department of Correction, State of IdahoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Hoffman v. AraveDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1998
- Hoffman v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.