Legal Opinion

Ross v. Federal Deposit Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided October 29, 2010No. 08-1851PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge KING and Judge GREGORY joined.

OPINION

WILKINSON, Circuit Judge:

Charlene Ross brought claims against Washington Mutual Bank (“WaMu”) for false reporting of credit information and unfair debt collection practices. But she tarried too long, and by filing outside of the Fair Credit Reporting Act’s (“FCRA”) two-year statute of limitations she lost any FCRA claims she may have had, whatever their merit.

Ross has tried to skirt this deficiency by bringing several state law claims. Those claims, in the main, are preempted…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Gorman v. Wolpoff & Abramson, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Price v. City of Charlotte, North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  4. Choice Hotels International, Incorporated v. Bsr Tropicana Resort, Incorporated, a Florida Corporation Susan Hounsom Milton JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  5. Dobson v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Cybernet, LLC v. Jonathan DavidCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  2. Llewellyn v. Allstate Home Loans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  3. Burrell v. DFS SERVICES, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
  4. Sparks v. Oxy-Health, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2015
  5. Cosmas v. American Express Centurion BankDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2010

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API