Cosmas v. American Express Centurion Bank
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOLFSON, District Judge:
Plaintiff Nicholas Cosmas (“Cosmas”) brought his action under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq., and various state laws. In ruling on Defendant American Express Centurion Bank’s (“AMEX’s”) previous motion for summary judgment, the Court directed the parties to file supplemental briefing addressing whether Plaintiffs state-law based negligence and “malicious and retaliatory conduct” tort claims were preempted by the FCRA. Having reviewed the parties’ submissions, the Court now grants summary judgment on these claims.
I. BACKGROUND…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Grossman v. Trans Union, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Sarlo v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- Spencer v. National City MortgageDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2011
- BAKER v. EXPERIANDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- BERTOLLINI v. HARRISONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.