Legal Opinion
Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Interstate Commerce Commission
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 12, 1981No. 77-2520PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.
I
SEPTA has filed a petition for review alleging that (1) the RSPO erred in promulgating a Standard requiring a commuter rail subsidizer to pay interest to Conrail on late payments without also promulgating a Standard requested by SEPTA which would mandate payment of penalties by Conrail for substandard service; and (2) the RSPO erred in failing to amend the Standards to provide that the liability of SEPTA for any payment to Conrail be limited to SEPTA’s rail commuter assets and revenues.
SEPTA, the acronym for Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Interstate Commerce Commission, Rail Services Planning Office, Consolidated Rail Corporation, Intervenor. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Interstate Commerce Commission, Rail Services Planning OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982