Legal Opinion

Paluczak v. Jones

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1932PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fowler, J.(1) The defendant moved for a directed verdict on the ground that plaintiff was guilty of negligence as a matter of law, and his motion was denied. He assigns this ruling as error. The evidence shows without dispute that the plaintiff was familiar with the intersection and with the bank and shrubbery on the northwest corner. He testified he was going thirty miles an hour. He did not reduce his speed. He could not see any one approaching on the intersecting road. The first he noticed was two glaring lights. He tried to avoid the other car by turning right but *643the collision occurred…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McGuiggan v. HillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Roeske v. SchmittWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Lang v. BaumannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Cameron v. Union Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Kilcoyne v. TrauschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Cherney v. SimonisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API