Legal Opinion

Pate v. Plymouth Mfg. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 8, 1941No. 15316PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Acting Associate Justice L. D. Lide.

Eugene Pate, the appellant above named, was a regular employee of Plymouth Manufacturing Company at its mill plant at McColl, in Marlboro County, as a doffer. He was injured on July 29, 1940, in an automobile collision a number of miles from the mill property, while returning from a baseball game, in which presumably he had participated, and claimed compensation for such injury under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, alleging that it was “the- result of an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stakonis v. United Advertising CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  2. Conklin v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. F. Becker Asphaltum Roofing Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Industrial Commission v. MurphySupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
  5. Claim of Holst v. New York Stock ExchangeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Tom Joyce 7 Up Company v. LaymanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. Wooten v. RodenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Complitano v. Steel & Alloy Tank Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  4. McFarland v. St. Louis Car Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1953
  5. Bailey v. Santee River Hardwood Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1944

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API