Local 1 of United Food & Com'l Workers v. Heinrich Motors
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER
TELESCA, District Judge.
FACTS
This is an action for enforcement of an arbitration award made pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement. Under Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (29 U.S.C. § 185(a)) this Court has jurisdiction to confirm, modify or vacate an arbitrator’s award. 1
The relevant facts may be summarized as follows: On January 15, 1981 Orest Poliszuk, a used car salesman employed by the respondent, Heinrich Motors Inc., was discharged from his job for allegedly disobeying an order from his employer to return to work. Poliszuk had been…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Sears, Roebuck And Company v. Teamsters Local Union No. 243Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Amanda Bent Bolt Company, Amanda, Ohio v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Local 1549Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
- In Re the Arbitration Between Local 435 of the Retail Store Employees Union & Heinrich Motors, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1981
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Teamsters Local Union No. 243District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Waag v. Thomas Pontiac, Buick, GMC, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
- In Re the Arbitration Between Local 345 of the Retail Store Employees Union & Heinrich Motors, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Robinson v. GormanDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001