Legal Opinion
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Teamsters Local Union No. 243
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided February 3, 1981No. Civ. A. No. 80-72597PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*659OPINION
FEIKENS, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff Company filed this action under 29 U.S.C. § 185 and 9 U.S.C. § 10(d) to set aside the arbitration Opinion and Award of Richard L. Kanner issued on July 14, 1980. The Arbitrator found that the decision of Sears, Roebuck and Co. to subcontract the work of its Maintenance Agreement Sales Department (“MA Sales”) to an outside contractor violated the collective bargaining agreement. The Arbitrator awarded reinstatement of the MA Sales Unit as well as back pay to affected employees from the date of the Award until the date of reinstatement. Both the Union…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Detroit Coil Company v. International Association of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers, Lodge 82Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- The Timken Company v. Local Union No. 1123, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- Nf&M Corporation v. United Steelworkers Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck And Company v. Teamsters Local Union No. 243Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Local 1 of United Food & Com'l Workers v. Heinrich MotorsDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1983
- Sears v. Teamsters Local Union No. 243Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982