Stiles v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Appellant Charles Thomas Stiles appeals the trial court’s sustaining of revocation of Stiles’ driver’s license after he refused to submit to testing pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 169.123 (Supp.1983). On appeal, Stiles argues: (1) lack of probable cause to invoke the Implied Consent Statute; (2) denial of his limited right to counsel; and (3) denial of due process. We reverse.
FACTS
On June 2, 1984 Stiles, while riding a motorcycle, grazed a raised curb on a highway entrance ramp, hit the curb again, and flipped over into a gully. He asserts he lost control of the motorcycle…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Holtz v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
- Tyler v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State, Department of Public Safety v. WiehleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hughey v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Douglas v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Pokrzywinski v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Thornton v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Villeneuve v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.