Thornton v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
A law enforcement officer asked a driver who had been involved in an accident to submit to alcohol concentration testing. The officer determined that the driver made a reasoned refusal, so the Commissioner of Public Safety revoked the driver’s driving privileges. The trial court found that respondent was incapable of deciding to refuse testing and that under the implied consent law, respondent should have been tested. The Commissioner appeals. We reverse.
FACTS
On March 13, 1985, at approximately 11:50 p.m., St. Paul Police Officer Michael Hinzman arrived at the scene of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Stiles v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
3Cited by6 opinions
- Douglas v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Villeneuve v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Heuton v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Lindemann v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- McDonnell v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.