Kenny v. Kelly
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J. C. B. Heb-bard, Judge. The facts are stated in- the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Britt, C.
Action to enforce an assessment against certain lots of land, for work done in the improvement of D street, in the city and county of San Francisco. Twenty-fourth avenue in said city terminates in said D street, and the lots in question, having a frontage on said avenue, were assessable for the expense of the work done on the intersection of the two streets, according to the rule prescribed by subdivision 4 of section 7 of the act to provide for work upon streets, etc., as amended. (Stats. 1891, p. 202.) This allows only one-half of the expense of the work on the intersection to be…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ryan v. AltschulCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Buckman v. LandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schaffer v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Pacific Paving Co. v. VersoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Perine v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900