Legal Opinion
Pelayo v. Nestle USA, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided October 25, 2013No. Case No. CV 13-5213-JFW (AJWx)PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [filed 9/23/13; Docket No. 30]
JOHN F. WALTER, District Judge.
On September 23, 2013, Defendants Nestle USA, Inc. and Nestle Prepared Foods Company Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) filed a Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint (“Motion”). On October 7,2013, Plaintiff Maritza Pelayo (“Plaintiff’) filed her Opposition. On October 14, 2013, Defendants filed a Reply. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for decision without oral…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Jerry L. Branch, Valenna Branch, Colby Branch v. Dale L. Tunnell, Individually and as Special Agent of Bureau of Land Management, State of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- John Desoto v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Ibarrola v. Kind, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- Brady v. Bayer Corp., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Ham v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Kelly v. Cape Cod Potato Chip Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2015
- Figy v. Frito-Lay North America, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.