Estate of Keig
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.
Petitioner Edith Keig, claiming to be the common-law spouse of Daniel T. Keig, deceased, appeals from a judgment and decree, following a verdict by a jury, determining that she was never married to him, is not his surviving wife and is not entitled to any interest in his estate. The respondents are the brother, sisters, and the children of a predeceased brother.
The petitioner was the daughter of the housekeeper and cook for Mr. and Mrs. Keig and was in the habit of visiting her mother at their home in the year 1927 while she was a first year high school student. The Keigs, who were childless,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. ZichfeldNevada Supreme Court · 1896
- Peters v. PetersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
- Clark v. ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 1920
- Dahlquist v. Nevada Industrial CommissionNevada Supreme Court · 1922
- In re Terry's EstateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Colbert v. ColbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Gallegos v. Union-Tribune Publishing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961
- Sancha v. ArnoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Jones v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- People v. MetzgerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971