Legal Opinion

Dahlquist v. Nevada Industrial Commission

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1922No. 2527PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*111By the Court,

Coleman, J.:

We will refer to the parties as they were designated in the trial court.

Paragraph 1 of the complaint alleges the creation of the defendant, Nevada Industrial Commission, under and by virtue of the provisions of an act of the legislature approved March 15, 1913 (Stats. 1913, p. 137), as amended (Stats. 1915, p. 279; Stats. 1917, p. 436; Stats. 1919, p. 305). The complaint also alleges that one Alfred Dahlquist, while employed by the Tonopah Belmont Development Company, which had elected to avail itself of the terms of the act mentioned, on the 2d day of February, 1920,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. ZichfeldNevada Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Clark v. ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Claim of Crockett v. International Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  4. Kuetbach v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Parker v. De BernardiNevada Supreme Court · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Magma Copper Co. v. NaglichArizona Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Nevada Industrial Commission v. ReeseNevada Supreme Court · 1977
  3. McBride v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
  4. Dunn v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Sancha v. ArnoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API