Legal Opinion

Peters v. Peters

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 2, 1923No. 10,545PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

The county court, on petition and hearing, revoked letters of administration theretofore issued to plaintiff in error. To review that judgment she sues out this writ and asks that it be made a supersedeas. At the request of *273both parties the cause is finally determined on this application.

Stella F. Peters, plaintiff in error (hereinafter referred to as administratrix), claiming to be the widow of Albert H. Peters, deceased, was, on her own application, appointed administratrix of his estate. Ten days later Harold C. Peters (hereinafter referred to as petitioner), son of deceased, denying the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Grigsby v. ReibTexas Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Hulett v. CareySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  3. Lambuth v. Stetson & Post, Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Quimby v. BoydSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
  5. Thorworth v. ScheetsIllinois Supreme Court · 1915

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Lefkoff v. SicroSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Gossard v. WatsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  3. People v. LuceroSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  4. Hamby v. J. R. Simplot Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Newman v. StoverOregon Supreme Court · 1950

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API