Legal Opinion · Dissent

Absorbo Beer Pad Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 9, 1942No. C. D. 580Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION

Tilson, Judge:

Having joined with my associates in deciding the cases of Absorbo Beer Pad Co. v. United States, reported as T. D. 49112 and 1 Cust. Ct. 115, C. D. 32, which passed upon the proper classification of merchandise somewhat similar to that in this case, I regret that I am not able to join in the decision signed by my associates in this case. Because this case has been submitted upon an entirely different record to that in each of the previous cases, and because of certain errors which, upon more mature deliberation, I feel were committed in those decisions, I feel…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. DouglasCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  2. Stiner & Son v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. United States v. WhiteCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. United States v. MeyersonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  5. Mills & Gibb Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API