Legal Opinion

United States v. White

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 22, 1911No. 514PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers,'G. A. 7115 (T. D. 31016).

1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge

This merchandise was imported at Boston. The collector at that port assessed it for dutiable purposes at the rate of 15 per cent plus 10 per cent ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 451 of the tariff act of 1909, as “gauffre leather." The importer claims that it is properly dutiable under the same paragraph at 15 per cent ad valorem, alleging that “ these goods were entered as ‘finished leather' dutiable at 15 per cent ad valorem, which we claim should be so assessed under paragraph 451 of the tariff act of August 5, 1909, which includes ‘all the (sheepskins) foregoing not specially…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Atkins v. Disintegrating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. United States v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Arden v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. United States v. McCoy Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  3. United States v. Brown & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  4. Dejonge v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  5. Absorbo Beer Pad Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API