Legal Opinion

Mills & Gibb Corp. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 29, 1926No. 2688PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

The merchandise in question is bleached cotton cloth. Duty was assessed thereon under the third subdivision of paragraph 903 of the Tariff Act of 1922, as woven-figured cotton cloth. The importer protested the classification and claimed it to be dutiable under the second subdivision of paragraph 903 as bleached cotton cloth.

The Board of General Appraisers overruled the protest from which action the importer has appealed to this court.

The pertinent portions of paragraph 903 are as follows:

Par. 903. Cotton cloth, not bleached, printed, dyed, colored, or woven-figured, containing yarns the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. DouglasCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  2. Wilson & Son (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Absorbo Beer Pad Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1938
  2. In re Security Engineering Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
  3. Absorbo Beer Pad Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
  4. Absorbo Beer Pad Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
  5. Absorbo Beer Pad Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API