United States v. Douglas
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7608 (T. D. 34818).
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge
The goods imported in each of these cases are similar in character and were each assessed for duty under paragraph 284 of the tariff act of 1913 covering “all woven articles, finished or unfinished, and all manufactures of flax,” and are claimed to be dutiable at a lower rate under paragraph 283 as “plain woven fabrics.” The question presented in the case therefore is whether the goods imported are plain woven fabrics.
In the main body of the cloth as woven the threads interlace in the ordinary plain weave, one under and one over. Along each border there appears a stripe or stripes made in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- White & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- United States v. WhiteCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lehn & Fink Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- Mills & Gibb Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- Wilson & Son (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- Atalanta Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
- Absorbo Beer Pad Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.