Legal Opinion

Williams v. Sandman

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided August 10, 1999No. 96-2669PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WIDENER wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Senior Judge MICHAEL concurred.

OPINION

WIDENER, Circuit Judge:

This case arises from the souring of a relationship between three business associates, H. Arthur Sandman, Thomas F. Walker, and C. Wayne Williams. On appeal, plaintiff Williams challenges an order of the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina refusing to set aside defendant Sandman’s foreclosure on Williams’ partnership interest in Columbia Hotel Associates and granting judgment as a matter of law to defendants…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Citizens & Southern National Bank of South Carolina v. LanfordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  2. Crane v. Citicorp National Services, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  3. Consolidated Aluminum Corporation v. Bank of Virginia and Graf-Comm., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  4. United Carolina Bank v. Caroprop, Ltd.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  5. Jeffcoat Ex Rel. Assets of Mims v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Nelson-Salabes, Inc. v. Morningside Development, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  2. Roanoke Cement Company, L.L.C. v. Falk Corporation Hamilton Sundstrand CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  3. Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A. v. Jim's Motorcycle, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  4. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
  5. Hunter Group, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API