People v. One 1950 Pontiac 2-Door Coupe
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BISHOP, J. pro tem. *
We have not been favored with any argument on respondent’s behalf, either written or oral. This does not surprise us, for we are satisfied that the affirmative answer given by the trial court to the question that the parties stipulated was the sole issue before the court, can not be successfully defended.
This is an action brought under sections 11610-11629, Health and Safety Code, providing for the forfeiture to the state of a vehicle used for the unlawful transportation of a narcotic. In reply to the “Notice of Seizure and Intended Forfeiture Proceedings,” addressed to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cornell v. ReillyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- People v. One 1948 Chevrolet Convertible CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- In Re AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- People v. One 1952 Chevrolet Bel AireCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- People v. One 1950 Cadillac 2-Door Club CoupeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
3Cited by1 opinion
- Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962