Legal Opinion

In Re Anderson

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 26, 1951No. Crim. 2318PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.

This is a proceeding in habeas corpus. Heretofore we issued an order to the respondent warden to show cause why the writ prayed for should not be issued. The matter was ordered submitted after the filing of the brief of the attorney general in opposition to the issuance of the writ, and on October 29th this court filed an opinion adverse to petitioner and ordered that the writ be denied. Petitioner then brought to our attention the fact that he had been given additional time within which to file a closing brief and asked that this court revoke the order theretofore made. We treated his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Lewis v. FrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. People v. KudukAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943
  4. In Re PaytonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Galyon v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
  2. People v. GriffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. People v. TatumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Rutherford v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. People Ex Rel. Gow v. Mitchell Brothers' Santa Ana TheaterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API