Legal Opinion

Ramsey v. Weyerhaeuser

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 11, 1993No. 79219PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ALMA WILSON, Justice:

The sole issue in this case involves whether or not the two-year statute of limitations found in 85 O.S.1991, § 43, applies to bar the petitioner’s right to claim compensation under the Workers’ Compensation Act. If her injury were the result of a single event, her right to claim compensation is barred. If she suffered a repeated trauma as she asserts, her claim is not barred. We hold that the petitioner suffered a repeated trauma, and may pursue her claim.

The petitioner was employed by the respondent, Weyerhaeuser, for sixteen years. In her Form 3, she alleged repetitive…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. AMF Tubescope Company v. HatchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Munsingwear, Inc. v. TullisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  3. McDonald v. Time-DC, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  4. Seaton v. Plasti-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Barnett v. Earthworks Unlimited, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API